Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Gentoo Trustees <trustees@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CI services for Gentoo & Social Contract meanings of "dependant" notifications on depgraph breakages
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:34:50
Message-Id: 552FABF8.70308@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] CI services for Gentoo & Social Contract meanings of "dependant" notifications on depgraph breakages by Peter Stuge
1 Il 16/04/2015 12:41, Peter Stuge ha scritto:
2 > Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >> If people want pure-FOSS tools, they need to make it happen.
4 > Selfless work lives on moral support among a few other things.
5 >
6 listen:
7 Git is the child of bitkeeper closing it's freeware program
8 it gave the kernel community a good start point to clone and improve
9 upon. Before it was CVS.
10
11 Actually an `emerge -uDN @world` fail constantly, because of broken deps
12 and other stuff (given a desktop profile with a good number of packages)
13 this fact render gentoo very unpleasant to keep up to date, it has never
14 been a breeze but it was better.
15
16 combining these two things I really could not care less, and nobody
17 should care less for the usage of proprietary tools to improve things,
18 knowing that thing can fail and could need a replacement.
19 In the meantime Gentoo can improve itself in other areas, manpower don't
20 seem too high at the moment.
21
22 also you can strive for HURD and not linux, but don't impose it on us
23 (at least not for now)
24
25 - Francesco R.

Replies