Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/shadow
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:39:32
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/shadow by "Paweł Hajdan
On 12-03-2012 11:35:43 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/12/12 11:27 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > My rsync0 now spits out this message: > > > > Virtual package in package.provided: virtual/shadow-0 > > See portage(5) for correct package.provided usage. > > > > I did not forsee this happening, but each and every Prefix user now gets > > this complaint on each and every emerge invocation. It does not seem to > > block any operation, but could we perhaps hold back further changes > > until I can sort this out with Zac? > > Ah, I read portage(5) now and adding a virtual to package.provided is > indeed explicitly prohibited. > > I removed it, but some further changes might be required for prefix > (i.e. version number >= 4.1 in package.provided to satisfy the virtual), > and I'll indeed hold back further changes in that area, > and preferably just let you do any necessary fixes for prefix.
Thanks a lot for your swift actions! -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature