| 1 |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:25:42 +0400 |
| 2 |
Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hello. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> There are droid fonts package in the tree. Author states that they are |
| 7 |
> apache licensed [1] (supposedly similar to google's android sdk) but |
| 8 |
> license itself is not included in the package (only .ttf files are |
| 9 |
> there). Should we RESTRICT="mirror" in such case or it's safe to drop |
| 10 |
> such restriction? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> [1] |
| 13 |
> http://damieng.com/blog/2007/11/14/droid-sans-mono-great-coding-font |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Thank you for any hints, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
RESTRICT=mirror is probably the safest bet. Both Apache licenses |
| 18 |
require a copy to be included when redistributing, source or binary. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
PS. Badger him into switching to OFL while you're at it. ;) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 25 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 26 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives