1 |
On 2018-09-16 10:59, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
>>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Michał Górny wrote: |
3 |
>> Since some developers were giving the sign-off 'in blanco' so far, |
4 |
>> I would like to emphasize that now it will actually mean agreeing to |
5 |
>> the document. Unless you have read the new policy and agreed with it, |
6 |
>> please don't do that. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I wonder how we should treat those existing Signed-off-by lines in the |
9 |
> tree. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> We could either say that we ignore any such lines on commits before |
12 |
> 2018-09-16 00:00:00 UTC, because there was no policy in place. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Or we could say that they certify the commit under the Linux DCO 1.1 |
15 |
> (https://developercertificate.org/), because in absence of an explicit |
16 |
> policy that's the only meaningful interpretation of a Signed-off-by |
17 |
> line. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Presumably, the first alternative is cleaner. Especially, since there |
20 |
> are commits with a Signed-off-by line that don't comply with the |
21 |
> conditions of the Linux DCO. |
22 |
|
23 |
+1 for ignoring "Signed-Off-By" line until 2018-09-16 00:00:00. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
29 |
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |