Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New copyright policy approved, please weigh your Signed-off-bys
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 10:30:19
Message-Id: 7137cab8-0608-c76d-3eeb-0451b4109d7e@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New copyright policy approved, please weigh your Signed-off-bys by Ulrich Mueller
1 On 2018-09-16 10:59, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2 >>> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
3 >> Since some developers were giving the sign-off 'in blanco' so far,
4 >> I would like to emphasize that now it will actually mean agreeing to
5 >> the document. Unless you have read the new policy and agreed with it,
6 >> please don't do that.
7 >
8 > I wonder how we should treat those existing Signed-off-by lines in the
9 > tree.
10 >
11 > We could either say that we ignore any such lines on commits before
12 > 2018-09-16 00:00:00 UTC, because there was no policy in place.
13 >
14 > Or we could say that they certify the commit under the Linux DCO 1.1
15 > (https://developercertificate.org/), because in absence of an explicit
16 > policy that's the only meaningful interpretation of a Signed-off-by
17 > line.
18 >
19 > Presumably, the first alternative is cleaner. Especially, since there
20 > are commits with a Signed-off-by line that don't comply with the
21 > conditions of the Linux DCO.
22
23 +1 for ignoring "Signed-Off-By" line until 2018-09-16 00:00:00.
24
25
26 --
27 Regards,
28 Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
29 C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature