Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 08:56:13
Message-Id: 4FCF1ADE.5010502@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue by Pacho Ramos
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
5 > El mar, 05-06-2012 a las 19:18 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
6 >> On 06/05/2012 05:51 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
7 >>> Is there any chance to detect this ZLIB_VERSION problem with
8 >>> revdep-rebuild (worst case: add a list of possibly broken
9 >>> packages with tests)?
10 >>
11 >> I'd suggest a special ebuild phase to check for ABI changes, like
12 >> the pre_pkg_preinst_abi_check phase suggested here:
13 >>
14 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192319#c20
15 >
16 > I guess, that phase would detect ABI change and package manager
17 > would know how to handle it by itself?
18
19 Yeah, it would be like a warning system, do detect cases when the
20 SLOT/ABI_SLOT were not bumped when they should have been. The idea is
21 that the developer who's doing the version bump will see the warning
22 and bump the SLOT/ABI_SLOT before committing the ebuild.
23 - --
24 Thanks,
25 Zac
26 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
27 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
28 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
29
30 iEYEARECAAYFAk/PGt4ACgkQ/ejvha5XGaMt8QCffullYkU7EQXeE7TeUri4nQya
31 ysIAoMhPQT+rEZbxKNvMiX8qNOEndiM1
32 =V7Tz
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies