Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Olivier CrĂȘte" <tester@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, gentoo-core@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Metastructure vote preliminary results
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 04:17:27
Message-Id: 1118722674.8917.8.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca
1 On Mon, 2005-13-06 at 22:50 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
2 > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 22:51 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
3 > > Dear all,
4 > > We have preliminary results from the metastructure vote, and we'll
5 > > publish a more thorough accounting tomorrow.
6 > >
7 > > *** Finished ranking candidates ***
8 > >
9 > > Final ranked list:
10 > > Oldschool-small-with-slacker-boot
11 > > Oldschool-small
12 > > Oldschool-large
13 > > Alternative
14 > > FOSDEM
15 > > Oldschool-large-with-slacker-boot
16 > > Task-force
17 > > Keep-current
18 > > Reopen-nominations
19 > >
20 > > My sincere thanks to those who voted.
21 > >
22 > > -g2boojum-
23 >
24 > Could we know the number of voters and the number of people eligible?
25
26 From the preliminary raw data, I count 100 votes out of 381 eligible
27 voters .. giving us only a 26.24% of participation... I guess the rest
28 just didn't care.
29
30 Also (as an election official), from the raw data, I can confirm the
31 results.
32
33 --
34 Olivier CrĂȘte
35 tester@g.o
36 x86 Security Liaison

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Metastructure vote preliminary results Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>