1 |
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 20:59 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 09:13 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:45:22PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
4 |
> > > Now I'm wondering - is there a sane way of handling this that doesn't |
5 |
> > > forcefully remove python 2.4? |
6 |
> > > e.g. could python modules be installed to multiple python versions? How |
7 |
> > > do others (ruby, perl, ...) handle it? For the moment I've "solved" that |
8 |
> > > by package.masking python 2.4, unmerging it and rebuilding all Python |
9 |
> > > modules - less than optimal ... |
10 |
> > See dev-python/validation-1.2.3 for another solution. |
11 |
> > It installs itself for all versions of Python that are on the system. |
12 |
> I don't fully understand the magic how it finds all Python versions, but can this be applied to other packages? |
13 |
> Are there reasons for not doing this (besides increasing build time)? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Also - how does portage react to "multi-installing" packages? |
16 |
|
17 |
This question seems better suited for the portage mailing list. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
solar <solar@g.o> |
21 |
Gentoo Linux |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |