Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ulm@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] multibuild: introduce a generic framework for custom phase functions.
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:47:43
Message-Id: 20130310144806.57d30603@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] multibuild: introduce a generic framework for custom phase functions. by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:44:42 +0100
2 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > >>>>> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
5 >
6 > > Yep. That's why the non-quoted fragment has a safety check and dies
7 > > if it doesn't.
8 >
9 > It doesn't matter if there's a safety check. Bash 4 features are
10 > simply not allowed in the tree.
11
12 Is there a technical reason for that? As far as I understand it,
13 the method used in the ebuild should guarantee that in the worst case
14 user would have to restart emerge once.
15
16 Well, unless we're talking about a theoretical package mangler which
17 intentionally uses internal, old version of bash to prove the point.
18
19 --
20 Best regards,
21 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] multibuild: introduce a generic framework for custom phase functions. Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>