From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete | ||
Date: | Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:20:04 | ||
Message-Id: | 1340918336.2243.3.camel@belkin4 | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete by "Michał Górny" |
1 | El jue, 28-06-2012 a las 10:26 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
2 | > On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:12:34 +0300 |
3 | > Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
4 | > |
5 | > > The logic in prune_libtool_files is not perfect[1]. |
6 | > |
7 | > Define 'perfect'. |
8 | > |
9 | > > To clarify: |
10 | > > |
11 | > > Use `prune_libtool_files --all` instead of plain |
12 | > > `prune_libtool_files` if you don't test the package with the USE |
13 | > > flags. |
14 | > |
15 | > Sounds like abuse of '--all' to me. It's like calling 'rm -r' for |
16 | > single file... |
17 | > |
18 | > > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/421197 |
19 | > |
20 | |
21 | But we will need to use "--all" in cases like pointed in that bug |
22 | report, no? :/ |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |