1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Tue, 2 May 2017 13:05:38 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
>Paweł Hajdan, Jr. schrieb: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>>>> Please stop editing package lists when you are not the maintainer |
8 |
>>>> and arches are already CCed. |
9 |
>>> +1 |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> Please stop it. |
12 |
>>> And yes that's also true for arch team members. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> Package list is maintainer territory. |
15 |
>> Curious, what are the reasons and what changes people make that they |
16 |
>> shouldn't? |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> I'm wondering if there's some solution to these issues (maybe better |
19 |
>> documentation, or an alternative way of accomplishing what these |
20 |
>> people try to do). |
21 |
> |
22 |
>As dilfridge pur jer in CC, I guess that some of jer's changes to bugs |
23 |
>were not welcomed by maintainers. |
24 |
> |
25 |
>One recent example of non-maintainer activity in the package list |
26 |
>field is bug 613104, where he just removed the entire package list |
27 |
>(and then marked the bug WONTFIX). |
28 |
>Also very common is that he changes fully qualified package names |
29 |
>(which is the correct syntax per [1]) into fully qualified package |
30 |
>atoms (which is the legacy syntax). Bug 616260 is one such example. |
31 |
|
32 |
I must admit that I did the same (changing full package names to full |
33 |
package atoms). IIRC when these package lists were introduced this was |
34 |
the only valid syntax and stable bot complained if it was not a package |
35 |
atom. |
36 |
|
37 |
>Best regards, |
38 |
>Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
39 |
> |
40 |
>[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
Kind regards |
44 |
Lars |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Lars Wendler |
48 |
Gentoo package maintainer |
49 |
GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 |