Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass | ||
| Date: | Sat, 02 Jul 2005 11:51:22 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1120304931.10735.10.camel@rivendell | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: qt.eclass by Paul de Vrieze |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:15 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 | > Wouldn't this be a good time to implement actual dependency ranges in |
| 3 | > portage. Btw. I normally use the following hack that portage might |
| 4 | > actually be made to understand: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > DEPEND="<x11-libs/qt-4.0 !<x11-libs/qt-3.2.1" |
| 7 | |
| 8 | This sort of trickery doesn't work in a SLOT-ed environment where |
| 9 | there's a version qt-2 around. The bottomline is that portage needs this |
| 10 | fixed. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - foser |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |