Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April)
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 21:15:16
Message-Id: 20070414221236.26614b2d@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) by Alec Warner
1 On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:17:24 -0700
2 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
3 > The whole argument against doing it the other way is that running
4 > tests, outside of RESTRICT, has absolutly nothing to do with any kind
5 > of api; which is why I'm against it. At that point arch teams would
6 > essentially be hijacking EAPI for something it was never meant to
7 > cover. We all know how bad that can be no?
8
9 Ebuild functions are an EAPI issue. They address how ebuilds are used
10 by the package manager.
11
12 --
13 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature