Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reviving the Sandbox project
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 20:33:30
Message-Id: 1506025998.3293.1.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Reviving the Sandbox project by "Michał Górny"
1 Ühel kenal päeval, N, 21.09.2017 kell 21:56, kirjutas Michał Górny:
2 > Hi, everyone.
3 >
4 > TL;DR: I'm looking for new people to resume work on sandbox, and I
5 > will
6 > most likely branch it at v2.10 and start keep-alive work on top of
7 > that.
8 >
9 >
10 > The state of our sandbox is not very well. Gentoo is currently using
11 > the old v2.10 with local patches. v2.11 is p.masked for a long time
12 > because of multiple unsolved bugs. The git repository also includes
13 > v2.12 tag that has not even been packaged for Gentoo. From what I've
14 > been able to establish, the bugs causing v2.11 mask are still present
15 > in git head.
16 >
17 > To add to this, the only person maintaining the code (vapier) has not
18 > touched it since March, and AFAIA he's not responding to any contact
19 > attempts from within Gentoo. Given this and the importance of sandbox
20 > to
21 > Gentoo at the moment, I think it's reasonable to presume he's MIA
22 > and start looking for volunteers to join the effort.
23 >
24 > I have already added myself to the project page [1] and I'm going to
25 > try
26 > to put some effort into improving the state of things. However, I'm
27 > not
28 > really an expert in the high magic used in sandbox. If anyone is
29 > interested in helping out, feel free to add yourself as well.
30 >
31 >
32 > The above considered, I don't think I'm really going to be able to
33 > solve
34 > the problems introduced by v2.11. If nobody has a better idea, I'm
35 > going
36 > to branch sandbox at v2.10 and look into backporting whatever's
37 > feasible
38 > and resuming development in hotfix mode on top of that.
39
40 Do you have a handy list of problems with v2.11?
41 Perhaps all is well for Gentoo usages after the more ptrace-happy
42 fallbacking commit (apparently was needed by ChromeOS) is reverted if
43 ptrace-path problems don't get fixes?
44
45
46 Mart

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Reviving the Sandbox project "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>