1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022, Florian Schmaus wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>>>> Judging from the gentoo-dev@ mailing list discussion [1] about EGO_SUM, |
4 |
>>>> where some voices where in agreement that EGO_SUM has its raison d'ĂȘtre, |
5 |
>>>> while there where no arguments in favor of eventually removing EGO_SUM, |
6 |
>>>> I hereby propose to undeprecate EGO_SUM. |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> 1: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/1a64a8e7694c3ee11cd48a58a95f2faa |
9 |
|
10 |
>> Can this be done without requesting changes to package managers? |
11 |
|
12 |
> What is 'this' here? |
13 |
|
14 |
Undeprecating EGO_SUM. |
15 |
|
16 |
> The patchset does not make changes to any package manager, just the |
17 |
> go-module eclass. |
18 |
|
19 |
> Note that this is not about finding about an alternative to dependency |
20 |
> tarballs. It is just about re-allowing EGO_SUM in addition to |
21 |
> dependency tarballs for packaging Go software in Gentoo. |
22 |
|
23 |
OK. Thanks for the clarification. |
24 |
|
25 |
Ulrich |