Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: Florian Schmaus <flow@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to undeprecate EGO_SUM
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:26:52
Message-Id: u35g8j1uk@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to undeprecate EGO_SUM by Florian Schmaus
1 >>>>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2022, Florian Schmaus wrote:
2
3 >>>> Judging from the gentoo-dev@ mailing list discussion [1] about EGO_SUM,
4 >>>> where some voices where in agreement that EGO_SUM has its raison d'ĂȘtre,
5 >>>> while there where no arguments in favor of eventually removing EGO_SUM,
6 >>>> I hereby propose to undeprecate EGO_SUM.
7 >>>>
8 >>>> 1: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/1a64a8e7694c3ee11cd48a58a95f2faa
9
10 >> Can this be done without requesting changes to package managers?
11
12 > What is 'this' here?
13
14 Undeprecating EGO_SUM.
15
16 > The patchset does not make changes to any package manager, just the
17 > go-module eclass.
18
19 > Note that this is not about finding about an alternative to dependency
20 > tarballs. It is just about re-allowing EGO_SUM in addition to
21 > dependency tarballs for packaging Go software in Gentoo.
22
23 OK. Thanks for the clarification.
24
25 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal to undeprecate EGO_SUM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>