Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: sh versionator.eclass
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:15:43
Message-Id: pan.2007.10.02.12.58.53@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: sh versionator.eclass by Roy Marples
1 Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> posted
2 1191324510.6284.107.camel@××××××××××××××××××.name, excerpted below, on
3 Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:28:30 +0100:
4
5 > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 06:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
6 >> i am convinced by superior standards and by good things. forcing the
7 >> standard from bash to POSIX is neither of these. i dont see that as a
8 >> flaw in my logic.
9 >
10 > Forcing? I'm not asking for anything to be forced, I'm asking for it to
11 > be allowed.
12
13 Why is this still here on dev? The thread has long ago become more
14 political than technical, it should be on project now.
15
16 I'm also rather disappointed no one else has asked that it be taken there
17 yet, considering all the protest there was on non-tech discussion here.
18 Where did all those folks go?
19
20 --
21 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
22 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
23 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
24
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: sh versionator.eclass Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: sh versionator.eclass Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>