1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Abhay Kedia wrote: |
5 |
> On Wednesday 13 Jun 2007 10:11:24 pm Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
6 |
>> Drop it from stable completely, possibly package.mask or move to |
7 |
>> overlay. Why should this closed-source rootkit be in stable? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> If closed source is the criteria of getting dropped from stable status or |
10 |
> tree, than are we dropping netscape-flash, vmware and NVIDIA etc. as well? |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
Nah it's not the only criteria, the focus is on the "rootkit" :) part [1] |
14 |
|
15 |
Also, ion3 was IIRC removed recently also for upstream trying to force |
16 |
new versions against our stable policy. And that was opensource. |
17 |
But maybe Skype is not so pressing to upgrade, just doesn't provide |
18 |
distfiles anymore. Then maybe we don't have to obey, but still it's |
19 |
really questionable if it should be marked stable at all. |
20 |
|
21 |
And yeah I'm a Java dev but at least Java is now open (I admit that the |
22 |
stable VM's in tree are not, yet) and I don't see that coming for Skype. |
23 |
Also Java (and your examples of closed source stuff) are not infamous |
24 |
for the bad stuff mentioned above. |
25 |
|
26 |
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype#Criticisms [2] |
27 |
[2] Oh noes I cited wikipedia, unreliable source of arbitrary information. |
28 |
|
29 |
- -- |
30 |
Vlastimil Babka (Caster) |
31 |
Gentoo/Java |
32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
33 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) |
34 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
35 |
|
36 |
iD8DBQFGcFKStbrAj05h3oQRArJMAJ9dAajoI7l1tde7/FvKzrubw0TCmgCfYrNj |
37 |
dCiD3UU7fiGY0YRFox/KXfw= |
38 |
=96ut |
39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |