| 1 |
Collins wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Just finished a lengthy interchange wih a "gentleman" (loosely |
| 4 |
>speaking) on another group this weekend. Said gentleman considers |
| 5 |
>himself to be a chief priest of the fhs religion, and he says that he |
| 6 |
>wouldn't touch gentoo with a fork because gnome and kde are in the |
| 7 |
>/usr hierarchy instead of the /opt hierarchy "where god intended them |
| 8 |
>to be." |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>Just curious, is he all wet, or is this a conscious departure from the |
| 11 |
>fhs requirements? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
I do touch gentoo, but I also would like if gentoo would put those "mega |
| 16 |
apps" (kde and gnome) |
| 17 |
in the /opt, I don't know if there is any rule* about this, I just like |
| 18 |
them better in /opt.. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Something that might be related to this is the question: |
| 22 |
Does gentoo folows the linux standart base? url: http://www.linuxbase.org |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
*: after looking in google it seems that there exists a supposed standart |
| 25 |
File Hierarchy Standart url: http://www.pathname.com/fhs |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
What do developers and Drobbins think of this, {should,are,must} any of |
| 28 |
this standarts be followed? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Miguel Sousa Filipe |
| 31 |
gentoo user in .pt (PORTUGAL) |
| 32 |
handle: m3thos |
| 33 |
more human than human |
Archives