| 1 |
Hi Rich, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> writes: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> Actually, I think it is more of a technical constraint. It is |
| 6 |
> basically impossible to blacklist somebody on a mailing list, since |
| 7 |
> all they need to do is roll up a new email address. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I can think of various arguments for whitelisting or not whitelisting, |
| 10 |
> but it seems silly to blacklist. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Okay, I see your argument. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Just a random bikeshedding. We might be able to require GPG signed |
| 16 |
email to make a post. Then we can blacklist the GPG identity? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
To think of it further, the web of trust is basically a whitelist. But |
| 19 |
it has the flexibility to chain the trust from a Gentoo dev by several |
| 20 |
'hops'. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Benda |
Archives