| 1 |
On Saturday 05 August 2006 17:29, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm not satisfied with the current implicit RDEPEND behavior either. I |
| 3 |
> propose that we make repoman force explicit definition of RDEPEND. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
and i'm on the opposite side where implicit RDEPEND should be clean: |
| 6 |
- eclass and ebuilds have their own sets of DEPEND/RDEPEND which do not in any |
| 7 |
way affect each other |
| 8 |
- RDEPEND, if not set, is defined as $DEPEND |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> After |
| 11 |
> all of the ebuilds have been fixed to stop relying on the implicit |
| 12 |
> definition, we can fix portage so that it no longer sets RDEPEND implicitly |
| 13 |
> at all. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
i see it being broken regardless, might as well go for a clean break rather |
| 16 |
than putzing around with middle ground |
| 17 |
-mike |
Archives