Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:55:07
Message-Id: pan.2008.08.31.21.54.45@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) by Joe Peterson
1 Joe Peterson <lavajoe@g.o> posted 48BAECC2.80403@g.o,
2 excerpted below, on Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:10:58 -0600:
3
4 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 >> Users don't need to see it.
6 >
7 > I cannot quite agree on that point. Given that Gentoo is a distro that
8 > appeals to the more technically-oriented users, I personally believe
9 > that what we expose as ebuild syntax is actually exposed to many users
10 > fairly profoundly.
11
12 Indeed. Ciaran himself is a user, now, tho a dev for other projects. Of
13 course, I'm a user too. Both of us care (tho I'm sure he cares more than
14 I do) about virtual and need to see it,
15
16 But I think less technical user (even "luser" in some cases) is how he
17 tends to use the word. The are certainly there, but that has never
18 really been Gentoo's focus, and we don't expect users to need their hands
19 held.
20
21 --
22 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
23 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
24 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman