Archives
Archives
| From: | Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND | ||
| Date: | Sun, 02 Sep 2012 19:40:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAN3AtvpXpAiBrUMx_5b80=5BV5xaQaDLkuFbCbKvb8h4VE-Utg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 | <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:46:19 +0200 |
| 4 | > Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 | >> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 6 | >> <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 | >> > and we have worked out all the difficulties. |
| 8 | >> |
| 9 | >> Please elaborate. What difficulties? What did you implement other than |
| 10 | >> plain SDEPEND? With what features? Lots of detail missing. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > The big issues you're ignoring: |
| 13 | |
| 14 | And you call them "big issues"? |
| 15 | Ah, the "you're ignoring" part looks a bit arrogant, are you short |
| 16 | with arguments ;-) ? |
| 17 | |
| 18 | > |
| 19 | > -- |
| 20 | > Ciaran McCreesh |
| 21 | |
| 22 | -- |
| 23 | Fabio Erculiani |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND | Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] EAPI 5+: split PDEPEND introducing SDEPEND | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |