1 |
2011/8/29 Tomá¹ Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o>: |
2 |
> Dne 29.8.2011 09:20, Maxim Koltsov napsal(a): |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> Hi Thomas, |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Why EAPI="3" is not supported? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I think we should always use the latest, and this is probably only way how |
9 |
> to force you lads to do so. Also it saves me from having to do needless || |
10 |
> die :) |
11 |
> You have any reason why require eapi3? |
12 |
|
13 |
No reason, i just like backaward compability :) |
14 |
|
15 |
>>> UNOPKG_BINARY="${EPREFIX}/usr/bin/unopkg" |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> On my machine unopkg is at '/usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/unopkg' |
18 |
>> (libreoffice-bin), so this can be a problem. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Hmpf, easier to do symlinks in the binpkg than to create optional logic in |
22 |
> the eclass, would you mind opening bug for that? (missing unopkg in bin) |
23 |
|
24 |
Done, https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381009 |