| 1 |
Have you checked if debian is using any special patches for that apache |
| 2 |
version? (you can see that if you get the source package, and look in |
| 3 |
the patches directory) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Hasse |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:32, Benjamin Podszun wrote: |
| 8 |
> What kind of Infos? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The Apache-Version is the same, so is the configuration. |
| 11 |
> The only thing that I noticed is that one apache instance sucks up to |
| 12 |
> 99% CPU... It never uses less than 30% .. |
| 13 |
> And since this is a Compaq Server with Dual P3 1GHz and 2GB RAM I doubt |
| 14 |
> that this is right (tm). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Any new insights? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 22:24, Brian Jackson wrote: |
| 19 |
> > I think I've got to agree with Jon on this one, without more info, it looks |
| 20 |
> > like an Apache/Apache config issue. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > --Brian |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > On Saturday 12 April 2003 02:09 pm, Benjamin Podszun wrote: |
| 25 |
> > > Hi there. |
| 26 |
> > > I switched to Gentoo on two of my servers recently. Before that I used |
| 27 |
> > > Debian stable with a 2.4.18-Kernel. |
| 28 |
> > > Right now the machines are nearly useless. They should serve lots of |
| 29 |
> > > pages, but every ~24h everything freezes without any load on the |
| 30 |
> > > machines.. The load drops to 0.01 and nothing is delivered. |
| 31 |
> > > Only a restart of apache resets this timeframe again. |
| 32 |
> > > Well, after searching for a solution for about 3-4 days I'm already in |
| 33 |
> > > the mood to wipe Gentoo, install Debian again and stay with Gentoo for |
| 34 |
> > > Desktop only.. |
| 35 |
> > > If anyone has any suggestions I'd be glad to give them a try, but I |
| 36 |
> > > cannot afford to have two systems down on a regular basis for more than |
| 37 |
> > > 2-3 days.. |
| 38 |
> > > |
| 39 |
> > > I installed 1.4, used the 2.4.20 vanilla-kernel and I installed nothing |
| 40 |
> > > special but exim and apache/php. |
| 41 |
> > > All of them use the most current ebuilds in the x86 portage-tree. |
| 42 |
> > > I wonder if this is related to the problems someone pointed out with the |
| 43 |
> > > select() performance? But it would be a vanilla-problem then? |
| 44 |
> > > |
| 45 |
> > > TIA for any suggestions, |
| 46 |
> > > Ben |
| 47 |
> > |
| 48 |
> > |
| 49 |
> > -- |
| 50 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 51 |
> > |
Archives