Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 23:40:25
Message-Id: 20200103233927.451e0f5b@symphony.aura-online.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies by Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
1 On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 22:34:19 +0000
2 Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <gentoo@×××××××.xyz> wrote:
3
4 > On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote:
5 > > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
6 > >> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
7 > >>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
8 > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
9 > >>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
10 > >>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
11 > >>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
12 > >>>>> local res=
13 > >>>>> for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
14 > >>>>> has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
15 > >>>>> - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
16 > >>>>> ntation}?,"
17 > >>>>> + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
18 > >>>>> ntation}(-)?,"
19 > >>>>> done
20 > >>>>>
21 > >>>>> echo "[${res%,}]"
22 > >>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
23 > >>>> used
24 > >>>> since 2010?
25 > >>>>
26 > >>> You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
27 > >>> eclass
28 > >>> maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if
29 > >>> Ruby
30 > >>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
31 > >>>
32 > >> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
33 > >> </sarcasm>*
34 > >>
35 > >> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
36 > >>
37 > > Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
38 > > chatter?
39 > >
40 > >
41 > Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't
42 > successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for
43 > developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this....
44
45 This may be a public list and I don't always expect threads to stay
46 precisely on-topic but the posts should still have some value. This was
47 just frivolous. You won't know this but I have defended your presence
48 on this list multiple times in the past. Please respect that.
49
50 --
51 James Le Cuirot (chewi)
52 Gentoo Linux Developer