1 |
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 22:34:19 +0000 |
2 |
Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <gentoo@×××××××.xyz> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote: |
5 |
> > On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: |
6 |
> >> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote: |
7 |
> >>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
8 |
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
9 |
> >>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass |
10 |
> >>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass |
11 |
> >>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() { |
12 |
> >>>>> local res= |
13 |
> >>>>> for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do |
14 |
> >>>>> has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \ |
15 |
> >>>>> - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme |
16 |
> >>>>> ntation}?," |
17 |
> >>>>> + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme |
18 |
> >>>>> ntation}(-)?," |
19 |
> >>>>> done |
20 |
> >>>>> |
21 |
> >>>>> echo "[${res%,}]" |
22 |
> >>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer |
23 |
> >>>> used |
24 |
> >>>> since 2010? |
25 |
> >>>> |
26 |
> >>> You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the |
27 |
> >>> eclass |
28 |
> >>> maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if |
29 |
> >>> Ruby |
30 |
> >>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it. |
31 |
> >>> |
32 |
> >> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?! |
33 |
> >> </sarcasm>* |
34 |
> >> |
35 |
> >> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit |
36 |
> >> |
37 |
> > Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless |
38 |
> > chatter? |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't |
42 |
> successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for |
43 |
> developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this.... |
44 |
|
45 |
This may be a public list and I don't always expect threads to stay |
46 |
precisely on-topic but the posts should still have some value. This was |
47 |
just frivolous. You won't know this but I have defended your presence |
48 |
on this list multiple times in the past. Please respect that. |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
James Le Cuirot (chewi) |
52 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |