1 |
Am 03.04.2010 11:26, schrieb "Paweł Hajdan, Jr.": |
2 |
> On 4/3/10 11:16 AM, Tobias Scherbaum wrote: |
3 |
>> Hell no, but ... |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up in a positive way. |
6 |
>> Summing it up the negative way one might say, we have lots of areas were |
7 |
>> users might get the idea Gentoo already is dead. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> For example: |
10 |
>> - hardened-sources are nowadays only available in an experimental |
11 |
>> overlay, lots of users keep asking what's happening to the |
12 |
>> hardened-sources on both the -dev but also the -hardened mailinglist. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I recently sent an e-mail to gentoo-dev, |
15 |
> <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_2eb703ee97afc64a29e5d148457ac8d5.xml> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> It seems that some work is being done, but there are people who |
18 |
> volunteered to help, like me. What needs to be done with hardened-sources? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Just a note: I'm using it on my servers, so I'm really interested in |
21 |
> them being maintained, and I'm also able to test. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
Most development of hardened-sources was done in hardened-development overlay. There are currently |
25 |
recent versions of hardened-sources, but they have some regressions, which should be fixed, before |
26 |
they are added to the main tree. If you want to help out with this package, i suggest you join |
27 |
#gentoo-hardened on freenode, since that is the place, where most of the conversation is done. |
28 |
Additionally it might have been better to send this mail at least in CC to gentoo-hardened ML, since |
29 |
most interested and active people are only subscribed there. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Thomas Sachau |
33 |
|
34 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |