From: | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, toolchain@g.o, base-system@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.26 and changes with SunRPC, libtirpc, ntirpc, libnsl (NIS and friends), ... | ||
Date: | Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:44:58 | ||
Message-Id: | 20170919204400.7b34c30f@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.26 and changes with SunRPC, libtirpc, ntirpc, libnsl (NIS and friends), ... by "Andreas K. Huettel" |
1 | On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:56:30 +0200 |
2 | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > sunrpc - build against glibc |
5 | |
6 | Now that I think about it: What about other libcs ? musl, uclibc, |
7 | freebsd or even the prefix ones ? |
8 | |
9 | [...] |
10 | > Porting a package means adding a dependency in the style of |
11 | > || ( <sys-libs/glibc-2.26 net-libs/libnsl ) |
12 | |
13 | |
14 | Shouldn't we prefix that || by elibc_glibc ? or only the glibc dep ? |