Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Grobian <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:07:28
Message-Id: 436CBC08.30905@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two by
1 "Bryan �������������������������������" wrote:
2 > Even if you don't realise that this will be a big help for many users or
3 > you just don't think those users deserver any help (not sure which one
4 > it is tbh) - you might at least consider the fact that only having to
5 > push news about major / critical changes in one place is going to make
6 > things a lot easier for devs.
7
8 Any help that you can give is great. I am not against the ideas in this
9 GLEP. It's are good ideas. However, you cannot push something that is
10 not there, and you cannot say you *have* to push it because other ways
11 don't work -- ways which aren't yet explored. News items as described
12 have never been published before, IMHO, and hence the effect of
13 un-filtered, un-personalised publishing of these news items is *not*
14 known. I would priorise on getting them published somehow, and in the
15 meanwhile continue on this GLEP from another perspective: "personalising
16 news messages based on the user's portage". Such GLEP can elaborate
17 much more on support for mailing automatically to root or another user,
18 pushing forcibly on the screen or reading via 'news-update', just to
19 suit every installation/user scenario that we can dream up.
20
21 It also is in the two separate issues that you snipped from my previous
22 mail.
23
24 I think we're not going to agree here, so to prevent any more lengthy
25 discussions over gentoo-dev on this topic, you can contact me off-list.
26
27
28 --
29 Fabian Groffen
30 Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list