1 |
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 26 Nov 2014 16:52:07 -0500 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 00:34:33 +0000 (UTC) |
5 |
>> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> While it pains me to say this, unfortunately it looks like we have |
8 |
>>> another "toxic person" situation to deal with, with all the |
9 |
>>> implications that come with it. Maybe it's time to deal with it. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Toxic wars have casualties; in one of the sides, or in both of them. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> IOTW; you're already dealing with it, you can only change the outcome. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> Can you be clear as to what you're recommending? |
17 |
|
18 |
I'm not sure if that question was of me or of Tom or of all readers... |
19 |
|
20 |
My operating assumption is that what I see is the tip of the iceberg. |
21 |
I'm not on core or on IRC, and while I sometimes read the council IRC |
22 |
logs, I've only caught the summaries a couple of times in the last year |
23 |
or so, so there's /certainly/ more going on than I see. |
24 |
|
25 |
So I'm not in a position to have a recommendation, only to worry, because |
26 |
it's my distro in the balance! =8^0 |
27 |
|
28 |
Tho I /can/ say I /seriously/ appreciate your effort in particular. You |
29 |
seem to be on the more active and visible side in the council, and more |
30 |
than anyone else, I see you constantly trying to play mediator and |
31 |
peacemaker. Surely it can't be easy, and at times I'm sure it looks and |
32 |
indeed might be hopeless, but /somebody/ has got to do it because even |
33 |
where it doesn't work it's a cryin' shame not to try, and for whatever my |
34 |
perspective is worth, I've never seen your effort be without merit or |
35 |
your opinion not worth giving considerable thought, because often your |
36 |
posts consider points I hadn't thought of, or did in passing but |
37 |
incorrectly passed over without appropriate consideration of the merits. |
38 |
|
39 |
> Are you suggesting that instead of trying to mediate between people who |
40 |
> don't get a long, it would be better to just pick one or the other as |
41 |
> the winner and boot the other out? |
42 |
|
43 |
There comes a point at which failure to take positive action of some |
44 |
sort, including kicking people out if it comes to that, ends up being |
45 |
action of its own. If it's one "him or me", my experience is it's the |
46 |
person making the demand that should, and usually does, go. If however |
47 |
it's the same "him" on the other end of multiple such instances, at some |
48 |
point the question must be asked where the problem ultimately resides. |
49 |
|
50 |
I won't pretend to have an answer and I'm glad I'm not the one in the |
51 |
position to make those decisions, but, well, there's some history of |
52 |
exceptionalism here, bending the rules and finding technical solutions |
53 |
where people with lessor stature with more minor violations have been out |
54 |
on their ear, because yes, there /is/ quite some valuable contribution at |
55 |
stake here, and the person in question is not only extremely technically |
56 |
talented, but also, apparently extremely adept at finding and walking the |
57 |
edge when it suits him. |
58 |
|
59 |
We've had that situation before, and ultimately I think it ended up best |
60 |
for all parties when that personality was told their contribution could |
61 |
continue if they wanted, but it could no longer be as a gentoo dev. I |
62 |
guess it's not a secret who I'm talking about, ciaranm. And yes, I think |
63 |
it /has/ been better for both him and /gentoo/ the way it turned out, as |
64 |
it freed both sides from a relationship that simply was no longer |
65 |
workable, and allowed creating one where both sides could and did still |
66 |
benefit from the contributions of the other, while now separated by |
67 |
enough distance and with each side having the ability to walk now |
68 |
whenever they wanted, that it actually worked. =:^) |
69 |
|
70 |
The ideal here would be to find a similar both-sides-workable |
71 |
relationship, but the man that can describe both what that might be and |
72 |
how best to get from here to there... if he exists... surely can be used |
73 |
in more worldwide consequence negotiations such as the Iranian nuclear |
74 |
talks or the Ukrainian situation, or even the Debian systemd thing that |
75 |
unfortunately seems to be tearing them apart ATM, and probably doesn't |
76 |
have the time for Gentoo! =:^\ |
77 |
|
78 |
> One of the challenges here is that if we were talking about just one |
79 |
> productive person who tended to drive everybody away that would be one |
80 |
> thing. The problem is that we have a lot of productive people who have |
81 |
> different sorts of personality quirks. |
82 |
|
83 |
Indeed. Quite the illustrative list you had, too. Like I said I'm glad |
84 |
you and the rest of council are dealing with it, not me, and my thoughts |
85 |
are with you, hoping for wisdom. |
86 |
|
87 |
-- |
88 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
89 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
90 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |