1 |
Kurt Lieber wrote: |
2 |
> What purpose does this serve? This would create all sorts of confusion. |
3 |
> Right now, you can meet someone in IRC and make a reasonable assumption |
4 |
> that their email address is <irc nick>@gentoo.org. This would confuse |
5 |
> things horribly imo. What about people like me that span multiple roles? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> What happens when someone (again, like me) starts out in one area, moves to |
8 |
> another, then still a third and finally a fourth? We're going to be |
9 |
> updating aliases all over the place and for what? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> How does any of this make Gentoo Linux a better distro? Does it reduce |
12 |
> bugs? Improve QA? Can I add -staff.gentoo.org to my CFLAGS and get a |
13 |
> 0.00001% speed increase? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> There is no technical reason why any of this is necessary and it doesn't |
16 |
> provide any tangible benefits that I can see. If a user really wants to |
17 |
> know someone's role within the project, they can go look it up on the web |
18 |
> site. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> --kurt |
21 |
|
22 |
You're preaching to the choir here (at least in me), I don't personally |
23 |
understand why everyone doesn't just have an @gentoo.org address - it |
24 |
seems the simplest possible solution, but it was the devs that seem to |
25 |
see it as some sort of a sin. |
26 |
|
27 |
Whatever subdomain gets implemented now is only going to be half-used |
28 |
anyway because of the number of people grandfathered in from previous |
29 |
arrangements with @g.o addresses. |
30 |
|
31 |
Personally I can't think of the last time I saw a company that forced |
32 |
one division of its' employees to use a different email address. Seems |
33 |
to me like telling all of the secretaries at a law firm that they have |
34 |
to use @secretaries.firm.com |
35 |
|
36 |
That all said, I am but one person with one opinion on the matter. |
37 |
|
38 |
Scott. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |