| 1 |
On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:58, Markus Ullmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> 3) replacement for bugs.g.o |
| 3 |
I would prefer if people would still comment on the bugs when they do some |
| 4 |
changes on the overlay so that at least we know that. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Some ebuilds found their way into the overlay, we talked about that |
| 7 |
> internally and I'll remove them after this mail is sent out, so that we |
| 8 |
> stick to maintainer-wanted things here. |
| 9 |
This is appreciated. On this note, I would like to ask what are you going to |
| 10 |
do with eclasses. From my POV I'd ask to absolutely _not_ touching eclasses |
| 11 |
at all in the overlay. I have bad past experiences with overlays replacing |
| 12 |
eclasses. As bad as with xgl overlay rewriting some of the kde packages and |
| 13 |
breaking then with gcc 4.1 :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ |
| 17 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives