| 1 |
On 6/7/07, Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> ...or, Trees and Tree Climbers: Shaking up the tree |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Comments? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> ~mcummings |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
As a non-dev with not a lot of free time, I applaud this suggestion. |
| 15 |
However, my core fear is the potential for it becoming subject to |
| 16 |
abuse, and people insisting on repeatedly uploading patches that are |
| 17 |
not actually wanted / necessary for the project, despite the package |
| 18 |
maintainer saying 'dude , stop' |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Basically, if a non-maintainer wants maintenance rights, how do they |
| 21 |
go about attaining them? , an automated service, or some vetting |
| 22 |
process? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
How do we go about handling the problem with the predicted increase in |
| 25 |
collisions? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Is CVS fast enough / flexible enough for such a massive change in users? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
(forgive me if I've made a misunderstanding, but im a SVN man, not a CVS'er ) |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Kent |
| 32 |
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x| |
| 33 |
print "enNOSPicAMreil kdrtf@×××.com"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}' |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives