Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How well supported is collision-protect?
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:18:05
Message-Id: 42704839.2050707@egr.msu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] How well supported is collision-protect? by Marius Mauch
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Marius Mauch wrote:
5 > On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:37:10 -0400
6 > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 >
9 >>On Wednesday 27 April 2005 08:29 pm, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
10 >>
11 >>>- How well is it expected to work?
12 >>
13 >>it's expected to work just fine
14 >
15 >
16 > Most of the time. However, sometimes there are some issues (the xorg
17 > move, perl modules manpages or portage compilation objects to name a
18 > few) that can't be fixed really. That's why I don't think it will ever
19 > be a default setting.
20 >
21 > Marius
22 >
23 Perhaps there needs to be a ebuild setting for
24 RESTRICT="no-collision-protect"? :)
25 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
27 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
28
29 iQIVAwUBQnBIOGzglR5RwbyYAQLycxAAnt/q9oYlBKKuS2/q2Ke7BNYQnTbh3N4v
30 7xlZdX6Iq5qJzUyS0tgXcgAzbPSuDZ5wLo/CmYEQkD5h/EUOYdcvqgRcixWrs+Ls
31 LcPqzBq75/M1Cm+1UHfX0U64vL/wn+k9f/TBTak/yA+8bBjDUM2WM80P4WHjz5zV
32 cxrFrKhQSN5ZgN66kgmcJoT78/eK+9d6DegzmwfFHE9xozPF4Uj3L2WPejSqHlt0
33 5FBPb75JcKCOFmSwaBkor+SkhqSvI/Aj0/yk87JbY6fFtB0ODKQ+77FXQMYbcv3K
34 Ag+8v36rAH2jequHz30kt4UgtLtvphG4hXdF63w6Yu935agtPm3lgL8tYzdr+q4/
35 S5bAS8WgkhjceW7zbfXT1yeryB8yLoQhvqt5ykNbAgnf3iyNbcK7mTBes7bAQ1HW
36 JEYKL5X0Iap2rgHdpw7ND9NE03gjPT+yhyZK/hsqnYOv4xXqXhAjXhyufTTUor9G
37 /HtEJRUk/uXRk7AtBBs25nKf+OoBIvuV1MtR/LkThGNw7gtxYu7Y7GGZ3FWb2qyD
38 WPdjNi5goiWRqUjyfEYnRSHosHUOCXn1olYtEGWW9gTQw/47GpOG0W3GF14Ru264
39 psNaygWl5YERFqdDRQ4r34/3BuZNis9wnVGRviVn9EdXXL6VnQt3LKtz6pw+hvwi
40 q+nnXjGYeqk=
41 =8EW2
42 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
43 --
44 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list