| 1 |
Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:49:55 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On a more global scale, we should decide if this is valid though. I |
| 5 |
>> haven't exactly been convinced that it is useful, but I'm not opposed |
| 6 |
>> to the idea. I'd just like to see a decision one way or another. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Yeah, unfortunately none of the people proposing the idea ever wrote a |
| 9 |
> glep or even filed a bug regarding this (AFAIK), also as the quoted |
| 10 |
> threads show there are a number of possible solutions for this. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
TGL did some work on this under bug #84884, though his changes are more invasive |
| 13 |
than what i had in mind. I don't see the need for portage to dig through |
| 14 |
use.*desc when euse already works and equery can pretty easily be made to. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Anyways I just like anything that makes use.desc more useful than |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
foo - adds support for foo |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
--de. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives