| 1 |
On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> [...] |
| 5 |
>>> So what would be the methodology of making sure a package has the proper |
| 6 |
>>> slot? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Obviously you would need to make sure that the package actually does |
| 9 |
>> support Qt5. Then, as I see it, we could do either: |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> || ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-gui:5 ) |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> This is wrong because qt4 and qt5 are not binary compatible. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>> or: |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> qt4? ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 ) |
| 19 |
>> qt5? ( x11-libs/qt-gui:5 ) |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> This is the only alternative AFAICS. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
In that case, if Qt5 is installed, the application might depend on Qt4, |
| 25 |
but when building it, might link against Qt5. |
Archives