Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: LTO use in the tree | ||
| Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:10:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38EobbNo75VN7F7reG8TZ6NTTJ35CQLJ5VARBO=hHDcm_w@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: LTO use in the tree by Ryan Hill |
||
| 1 | > One thing I forgot to mention - LTO can also have detrimental effect on certain |
| 2 | > architectures. On some (eg. ppc), performance can actually be degraded due to |
| 3 | > increased register pressure. On others like alpha it's questionable if it'll |
| 4 | > even work at all... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Worked for me on alpha, at least for what I tried. It cut eix's binary |
| 7 | from 2 to 1.3 MB as well. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: LTO use in the tree | Ryan Hill <rhill@g.o> |