| 1 |
On 01/24/2010 08:20 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2010/1/24 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>: |
| 3 |
>> On 01/24/2010 03:02 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> You can't have functioning package management without the hard |
| 5 |
>>> dependencies it requires. So both portage and python should be in the |
| 6 |
>>> system set. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Why should we keep redundant information in the list? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> How is that redundant? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Cheers, |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The problem the original poster wanted to solve is having a warning when |
| 15 |
trying to unmerge something in "system". The best way here is to file a |
| 16 |
Portage enhancement request and not pollute the profile system set |
| 17 |
marking. The purpose of the packages file is to describe what needs to |
| 18 |
be installed for a minimal system to work so it doesn't make sense to |
| 19 |
pollute it with implementation details. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
Petteri |
Archives