| 1 |
Michał Górny posted on Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:47:38 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:30:02 +0200 Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> On 08/09/2012 09:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:42:15 +0200 Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |
| 8 |
>>> wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
>>>> [W]e could discuss about why reinventing shellscript may |
| 11 |
>>>> not be that sound and other less glaring, horrid and |
| 12 |
>>>> appalling design choices. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> Yes, exactly. So why does openrc reinvent that horrible shellscript? |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> It is not re-invented, in fact we can use any compatible shell. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Or anything else what can be spawned for shell. And a lot more what you |
| 19 |
> won't expect. And guess what, people are actually doing crazy things |
| 20 |
> with it because someone forgot to tell them how a init.d script should |
| 21 |
> work. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sounds interesting. A couple quick links to examples of what you had in |
| 24 |
mind would be nice. =:^) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
(Or a bit more description, enough to both get the concept and google |
| 27 |
with would be good, but links could be quicker if you have them handy, |
| 28 |
and are less likely to spawn even further afield subthreads.) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 32 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 33 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives