Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Karsten Schulz <kaschu@×××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] RFC: security updates only? (security-1.0.ebuild)
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 09:46:18
Message-Id: 200308161146.16771.kaschu@t800.ping.de
1 Hi all,
2
3 At bugs.gentoo.org I attached an tarball with my version of an ebuild, which
4 automatically will install *only* those security updates, which are relevant
5 to your system (see <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5835>).
6
7 The trick is the following code in the ebuild:
8 DEPEND="
9 $(has_version 'nfs-utils' && echo '>=nfs-utils-1.0.4')
10 $(has_version 'gnupg' && echo '>=gnupg-1.2.2-r1')
11 "
12 this will create dependencies on the fly: Only if you have nfs-utils
13 installed, the new version with the bugfix will appear as a dependency. Same
14 with gnupg.
15 There is no need for new 'emerge' options or KEYWORDS.
16
17 For his own system, the admin has to type in only:
18 emerge rsync
19 emerge security
20
21 or, if he is interested in this stuff:
22 emerge rsync
23 emerge -p security
24 and followed by 'emerge security', if necessary.
25
26 The only drawback at the moment is, that there is no automated way to generate
27 the value of the DEPEND variable by the GLSAs. Maybe here can Marius' XML
28 format help. With GLSAs in such a format, a simple script can generate the
29 security-ebuilds, the postings at forums.gentoo.org and the mails in
30 gentoo-announce! I would love to hear from some core developers and others
31 what you think (is it critical to use an ebuild, which does not compile and
32 install its own sourcecode, because it has none?).
33
34 I know, that this can (and must) be improved in the future (more information,
35 references to advisories, signing the ebuild, a.s.o.), but at the moment,
36 this way seems to me to be an easy one, isn't it?
37
38 Comments?
39
40 Karsten
41
42
43 --
44 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: security updates only? (security-1.0.ebuild) Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>