Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:27:22
Message-Id: 20080106022402.01174707@snowcone
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January by Martin Jackson
1 On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:18:09 -0600
2 Martin Jackson <mjolnir@g.o> wrote:
3 > See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191550 - it took > 2
4 > months for mips to keyword it.
5 >
6 > Security bugs are normally supposed to have enhanced priority for
7 > keywording, etc.
8
9 Perhaps you should have explicitly stated in the bug that it was for
10 security reasons and thus a priority. Make things easy for the arch
11 teams -- if you have useful information like that, provide it in an
12 easy to see place. Looking at that bug, I don't see anything indicating
13 that there's any reason it should have been considered over more widely
14 used packages.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Martin Jackson <mjolnir@g.o>