| 1 |
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:51:45 -0700 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
| Paul de Vrieze posted <200409271113.17794.pauldv@g.o>, |
| 3 |
| excerpted below, on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:13:17 +0200: |
| 4 |
| |
| 5 |
| > - Keep your hands of the priority settings that increase priority, |
| 6 |
| > when a |
| 7 |
| > compilation fails for you it does not mean that it is a blocker. |
| 8 |
| |
| 9 |
| In this case, the description for "blocker" needs changed. It says |
| 10 |
| if it prevents development or use of the app, it's a blocker. |
| 11 |
| Obviously, if it doesn't compile, you can't use it, which makes it a |
| 12 |
| blocker by the existing definition. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Think of the 'app' as being the Gentoo distribution, not a particular |
| 15 |
ebuild. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) |
| 19 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 20 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives