| 1 |
Daniel Campbell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 12:18:04AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'd like to establish the following changes to the mailing lists: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > 1. Posting to gentoo-dev@ and gentoo-project@ mailing lists will be |
| 6 |
> > initially restricted to active Gentoo developers. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I don't think this plan will have the effect you're going for, |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I agree, and I'll double down on my previous comment on this proposal: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I consider the proposal to be the wrong solution. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> but let's be honest here: the "RFC" is just a formality; the decision's |
| 16 |
> already been made. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I hope that a mere proposal doesn't automatically mean policy change. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> If the "real leaders" of Gentoo want to divide and fragment the |
| 22 |
> community, it's their prerogative. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
When there is a request for comments, there should also be comments. :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Far too many fall into the simple trap that is tribalism, and I'd like |
| 27 |
to encourage everyone on this list to not be that kind of person, |
| 28 |
because there really is no "us and them", there is only "us". |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> As we tell users who do something they're not supposed to: You get |
| 32 |
> to keep the pieces. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Well, let's see what happens, now that both developers and |
| 35 |
non-developers have clearly spoken out *against* this proposal. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Kind regards |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
//Peter |
Archives