Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Misquoted in the GWN
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:57:09
Message-Id: 20051128175430.0ebd4f4b@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Misquoted in the GWN by Henrik Brix Andersen
1 On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
2 <brix@g.o> wrote:
3 | A friend of mine just alerted me to the fact, that I am featured in
4 | this weeks Gentoo Weekly News. Odd, I thought, noone had asked me
5 | anything regarding the GWN...
6
7 Not the first time this has happened...
8
9 | I suggest that in the future, all developers who are directly quoted
10 | in the GWN are contacted prior to posting the quotes. I realize that
11 | this will put a bit more work load on the GWN authors, but it should
12 | be as simple as sending a mail with the relevant section quoted for
13 | the developer to accept.
14
15 Also, why not bring back the "post to -core" requirement? Make it a
16 rule that it can't be labelled as an official Gentoo publication unless
17 it gets some review...
18
19 --
20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (The one that looks before leaping)
21 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
22 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Misquoted in the GWN Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>