1 |
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 21:10 +0100, Grobian wrote: |
2 |
> Users don't care about security[1], adminstrators do. |
3 |
> Administrators don't care about breaking installations[2], users do. |
4 |
|
5 |
That's the problem with sweeping generalisations .... they're just too |
6 |
general to be of any value in a discussion. |
7 |
|
8 |
> while I claim it 1) doesn't |
9 |
> work because the information is hard to find and 2) it will work for a |
10 |
> certain group of people very well if the information would be there. |
11 |
|
12 |
I agree with 1) ... in fact, it's mentioned in the blog entry that |
13 |
kicked all of this off. |
14 |
|
15 |
But your second claim ... |
16 |
|
17 |
I personally don't care about trying target and satisfy a "certain group |
18 |
of people". I really don't. I'm after 100% of the userbase. Nothing |
19 |
less is fit for purpose. I'm not interested in small fractionals in |
20 |
this case. And especially not *only* small fractionals. |
21 |
|
22 |
You don't seem to share this aim. To me, you're coming across as |
23 |
wanting the news delivered to your exact personal preferences only, with |
24 |
no regard for the wider issue or what may be best for the Gentoo project |
25 |
and especially our userbase as a whole. |
26 |
|
27 |
My personal conclusion was that there is only one place where we can |
28 |
have any degree of certainty that we have the attention of 100% of the |
29 |
userbase - or as near as damn it. I believe that place is right beneath |
30 |
the message that tells the user they have CONFIG_PROTECTED files that |
31 |
need updating. |
32 |
|
33 |
Hence emerge --news. |
34 |
|
35 |
If you have found *one* place where we are even more likely to have the |
36 |
attention of 100% of the userbase, please share it with us. If there's |
37 |
a better place, we should use that instead, and I will very happily |
38 |
support it. |
39 |
|
40 |
If we can put something together that takes the news available through |
41 |
emerge --news, and pushes it out via other places (web, mailing lists, |
42 |
whatever), I have no real problem with that. |
43 |
|
44 |
But I think that there is a very good reason why it needs to come later, |
45 |
why now is *not* the time. |
46 |
|
47 |
We need to establish *one* authoritative source of news. We can't do |
48 |
that if we simultaneously launch several sources of news all at once. |
49 |
We have to launch *one* service first, give the userbase time to adjust |
50 |
to that, and then start making the news available via additional |
51 |
sources. |
52 |
|
53 |
> Don't worry I'll shut up now as there is clearly no interest for a bit |
54 |
> broader thinking. |
55 |
|
56 |
I find your thinking anything but broad on this topic. |
57 |
|
58 |
Best regards, |
59 |
Stu |
60 |
-- |
61 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
62 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
63 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
64 |
|
65 |
GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
66 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
67 |
-- |