| 1 |
On Sunday 10 April 2005 7:32 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 19:27:51 +0200 Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 18:12 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> | > On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 12:39:45 -0400 Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@g.o> |
| 7 |
> | > |
| 8 |
> | > wrote: |
| 9 |
> | > | Regarding GLEP 36[1], solar has asked me to try and figure out a |
| 10 |
> | > | way to provide both CVS and Subversion for one repository and keep |
| 11 |
> | > | them sync'd somehow. |
| 12 |
> | > |
| 13 |
> | > Please don't. This would mean we'd have to stick with all of the |
| 14 |
> | > restrictions of CVS. |
| 15 |
> | |
| 16 |
> | We have to do that anyway until cvs is phased out. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Eh? Er, no. We're already using SVN for a whole load of Gentoo projects, |
| 19 |
> but we're currently hosting them off berlios rather than official Gentoo |
| 20 |
> infrastructure. That's the purpose of this GLEP. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I see, there's a greater demand on this subject than I even thought |
| 23 |
about. I even expected that you'll all kill me for the whols SVN |
| 24 |
alternative thoughts I'm raising. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Christian Parpart. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt |
| 30 |
19:45:33 up 18 days, 8:51, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.73, 0.60 |
Archives