| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:20:32PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 30 September 2004 2:04 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Well, the issue is that without being root the file permissions in the |
| 4 |
> > install stage will not be correct. The only even more secure option |
| 5 |
> > besides the sandbox would be some kind of chroot with an overlay |
| 6 |
> > filesystem. That would though require a nonstandard kernel module and as |
| 7 |
> > such raise all kinds of other problems. |
| 8 |
> Simply implementing sandbox as a kernel module would have the same security |
| 9 |
> effect as such a chroot. Then, libsandbox (or whatever it's called) could |
| 10 |
> simply use the module if available and fallback to the normal way if it's |
| 11 |
> not... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Well i don't use modules on my servers and i sure wont start |
| 14 |
using them only for portage. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Christian |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives