| 1 |
On Friday, June 17, 2011 14:39:22 Kacper Kowalik wrote: |
| 2 |
> W dniu 17.06.2011 18:41, Mike Frysinger pisze: |
| 3 |
> > On Friday, June 17, 2011 05:01:10 Kacper Kowalik wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> W dniu 17.06.2011 05:03, Mike Frysinger pisze: |
| 5 |
> >>>> DEPEND="virtual/fortran" |
| 6 |
> >>>> |
| 7 |
> >>>>> RDEPEND="${DEPEND}" |
| 8 |
> >>> |
| 9 |
> >>> i'm not sure that RDEPEND is correct. do all fortran compilers |
| 10 |
> >>> additionally require the fortran compiler to be available at runtime ? |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> They require fortran runtime library if they don't link it statically. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > *if* there is a fortran runtime library in the first place. gcc provides |
| 15 |
> > one, but does that mean all fortran compilers do ? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> It *really* makes things easier if virtual/fortran is in RDEPEND. Is it |
| 18 |
> serious obstacle? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
i didnt say it was an obstacle. i asked if it's actually correct. atm, it |
| 21 |
would seem it is required. |
| 22 |
-mike |
Archives