1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:19:25 -0500 Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> |
3 |
> wrote: |
4 |
> | So, what do we want to do about this? Should we have some repoman |
5 |
> | warning if a USE flag exists in both files, or should it be |
6 |
> | acceptable? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The whole idea of global USE flags is that they're the same for all |
9 |
> packages that use said flag, and thus do not get a use.local.desc |
10 |
> entry. |
11 |
|
12 |
a global USE flag duplicated in use.local.desc could be used to give specific |
13 |
information about exactly what effect the flag has on a certain package, or if |
14 |
for some reason it does differ slightly from the global meaning. |
15 |
|
16 |
global use flags (searching: doc) |
17 |
************************************************************ |
18 |
[- ] doc - Adds extra documentation (API, Javadoc, etc) |
19 |
|
20 |
local use flags (searching: doc) |
21 |
************************************************************ |
22 |
[- ] doc (app-examples/fakeapp): |
23 |
Build user manuals in PDF format (requires ps2pdf) |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
it's been mentioned before but i don't think anyone jumped on the idea. i |
27 |
personally don't care either way, just wanted to bring it up while it's on topic. ;P |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
--de. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |