1 |
2010/1/17 Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>: |
2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>: |
3 |
> As much as you love to have the new and shiny VDB2, it is far off. |
4 |
> Prototyping and drafting implementations would be great to have some |
5 |
> base where we can discuss on (in a civil manner). So having this |
6 |
> timestamp would be a good way to prepare a sane migration path. |
7 |
|
8 |
No, it wouldn't. Brian's proposal a) would be of no use whatsoever for |
9 |
VDB2 migration, and b) would not be used by VDB2. Having a *decent* |
10 |
cache validation mechanism is a good idea; having a half-baked one is |
11 |
a waste of time. |
12 |
|
13 |
-- |
14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |