| 1 |
Dmitry Grigoriev wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello everyone. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I posted an enhacement suggestion to bugzilla and was advised to discuss |
| 5 |
> it here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282491 (please read with |
| 6 |
> comments). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The idea is that package tree physical structure must correspond to |
| 9 |
> logical structure. E.g. package kde/games/tactics-and-strategy/knetwalk |
| 10 |
> instead of kde-base/knetwalk, and kde/games/all instead of manually |
| 11 |
> managed meta-package or set @kde-games (kde/all == @kde, |
| 12 |
> kde/games/arcade/all == @kde-games-arcade, ...). |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Jeremy Olexa already answered me in bugzilla that this is not new idea, |
| 15 |
> but I'll submit my suggestion here anyway as a "voice of crowd". :) I'm |
| 16 |
> just home user with about 2 years linux experience, do like gentoo, but |
| 17 |
> with exception of this inconvenience. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Best regards, |
| 20 |
> Dmitry |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
I don't see a problem with this per-se other than that the massive |
| 26 |
amount of re-organization which would be required, which could otherwise |
| 27 |
be spent on fixing bugs, adding enhancements, and other cool stuff. I |
| 28 |
think the price is too high in the manpower catagory. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Andrew |
Archives