Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 00:34:20
Message-Id: 20080531022953.f4845944.genone@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) by Mart Raudsepp
1 On Sat, 31 May 2008 00:47:44 +0300
2 Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Portage developers - is there anything we should do to get --as-needed
5 > to make.conf.example and other places, beyond fixing the known bugs on
6 > the appropriate bug tracker?
7
8 make.conf.example is no big deal, that's just documentation, though
9 personally I'd prefer to remove the toolchain (CHOST, *FLAGS) stuff from
10 there so we don't have to maintain all the arch-specific diffs.
11
12 If you want to really enable it by default you'll have to persuade the
13 profile maintainers to add it into the appropriate make.defaults.
14
15 Marius
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list